Nobody's Fool (Retro)

by Edward Dunn


NOBODY’S FOOL (1994) R 110 Minutes Director: Robert Benton Writer: Robert Benton (based on the novel by Richard Russo) Paul Newman, Bruce Willis, Jessica Tandy
CAST Paul Newman...Donald “Sully” Sullivan Bruce Willis...Carl Roebuck Jessica Tandy...Miss Beryl Peoples Melanie Griffith...Toby Roebuck Dylan Walsh...Peter Sullivan Pruitt Taylor Vince...Rub Squeers Gene Saks...Wirf Josef Sommer...Clive Peoples Jr. Philip Seymour Hoffman...Officer Raymer Philip Bosco...Judge Flatt
NOBODY’S FOOL (1994)

Here’s something the 4K transfer can’t give back: before NOBODY’S FOOL even starts, the VHS runs its own trailer reel first, a Paramount Home Video ad for its “Classic Romances” line, “Priced to Own,” scored to a needle-drop of “Take Your Breath Away” — the studio repurposing its own TOP GUN song to sell a shelf of unrelated tapes. Then, finally, the “Feature Presentation” card: gold letters, purple gradient, a fanfare doing a lot of emotional work for what is, functionally, a logo screen. None of that exists on the disc. The 4K version starts the movie exactly where the movie starts. What’s missing isn’t picture quality — the VHS looks worse, softer and dimmer — it’s the ceremony a studio used to build in front of its own product, the sense of an event about to happen instead of a file about to play. The tape dates itself before the movie even begins. The movie underneath it hardly does.

There was a time when Paul Newman was far more than those famous blue eyes staring back at you from a bottle of salad dressing or a stone-fired-crust frozen pizza. Yes, he raced cars in real life — not just in that Pixar movie. For younger readers who may know only the brand, Newman was first and foremost one of the great screen actors of his generation. What I remember most is that unmistakable grin in COOL HAND LUKE, equal parts mischief and defiance. Fast-forward fifteen years and he was already playing grizzled veterans. His first performance that truly felt like an old-man role came in THE VERDICT (1982), where he played a washed-up alcoholic lawyer clawing toward redemption. By the time NOBODY’S FOOL arrived in 1994, Newman looked every bit his nearly seventy years, but the goods were still very much there. The charisma hadn’t dimmed, and that famous smile could still light up the screen.

That wasn’t merely a nostalgic squint backward, either. Newman earned his eighth Best Actor nomination for Sully, losing to Tom Hanks in FORREST GUMP. What makes the nomination interesting is its timing. THE VERDICT had earned him a nomination in 1982, only for him to lose to Ben Kingsley in GANDHI. Then came THE COLOR OF MONEY in 1986, which finally won him the competitive Oscar the Academy had been withholding since COOL HAND LUKE — the sort of makeup prize an industry hands out once it has embarrassed itself for long enough. By 1994, Newman had nothing left to prove and no debt left for anyone to settle. The Academy nominated him again anyway. That wasn’t sentiment. That was a room full of voters looking at a nearly seventy-year-old man playing a construction worker with a bad knee and deciding the work stood on its own.

The construction worker with the bad knee has a name: Donald “Sully” Sullivan, and the first thing the movie tells you about him is how he talks to his landlady. Miss Beryl Peoples opens the film narrating a pattern to someone named Clive Sr.: a birdbath struck by lightning last week, a streetlight the year before, something working its way closer to her house every year. It takes a few lines to realize Clive Sr. is her late husband, not anyone in the room. “I have the feeling this is the year he lowers the boom,” she says, meaning God, meaning herself, not Sully at all. Sully’s response, once he arrives, is to ask if she’s still alive in there. She offers tea. He says no. She asks about his necktie, half worried it means police trouble again. He tells her not to worry unless she’s the one who turned in his parking tickets. Nobody in the scene is in crisis, and nobody is really talking about anything, which is the point: this is two people who have lived above and below each other long enough that mortality and porch railings get discussed in the same tone of voice.

That’s North Bath before the movie has told you a single thing about the plot. Russo built the town out of Ballston Spa, New York, permanently in the shadow of a fancier neighbor down the road, just as fictional North Bath sits in the shadow of fictional Schuyler Springs. Peter and the grandkids haven’t shown up yet. The porch has already told you everything you need to know.

Sully’s first words to his own son, three years since the last visit, are “you need a lift?” Peter has to say “Dad?” before Sully places him, and what comes back is practical, not warm — a ride offered the way you’d offer one to anyone who needed it. Peter, it turns out, has been teaching at the University of West Virginia. He’s arrived for Thanksgiving with his wife, Charlotte, and his two young sons, Will and Wacker. The tension between Peter and Charlotte is audible before anyone’s out of the car — someone calls it “the Thanksgiving from hell,” and someone else tells them to knock it off. Sully’s ex-wife, Vera, Peter’s mother, lives close enough that she’s factored into the weekend too, which makes this less a homecoming than a logistics problem with feelings folded in. It’s the same move Beryl gets on the porch: solve the practical problem, skip the feeling. This time it’s aimed at his own son.

The two boys meet Sully for the first time in the car, and it doesn’t go especially well. Wacker wants to know who he is. Charlotte tells him it’s his grandfather. “Does he always look like that?” Wacker asks, and Sully doesn’t defend himself: “Yeah, most of the time.” Sully asks, in turn, how the kid came by the nickname. Wacker answers by shouting it — “Wacker!” — and slamming a book into Sully’s bad knee, hard enough that Peter has to pull the car over. Sully reacts in the moment, real pain and no attempt to hide it, then lets it go. No lecture for the kid, no grudge carried into the rest of the scene. Will is a different matter: the boy who gets Sully’s attention from that point forward.

Will ends up in Sully’s care almost by accident. Peter has work to do in town, Sully offers to take the boy with him, and that’s it — the arrangement that will define the rest of the movie begins as a logistical fix. It’s Sully himself who worries about the site out loud — what if Will falls into a ditch, what if he steps on a nail — a caution he’s never once extended to himself. Peter laughs. Sully doesn’t let it go: “What’s so funny?” “Nothing.” It’s that non-answer that gets him there: “You mean, I worry about him, and I never worried about you?” Peter doesn’t deny it. “Well, you skipped a generation, didn’t you?” There’s no joke doing the work here, no deflection. Peter means it, and Sully doesn’t argue. The movie never resolves what that means — whether the tenderness Sully shows Will is something new that a second chance unlocked, or whether it was always there and Peter simply never received it. It lets the accusation sit unanswered while Sully takes the boy to work anyway.

The house Sully takes him to is his childhood home, the one Miss Beryl will later save by sending Wirf a check for the back taxes. Sully and Carl go inside to look it over and completely forget that Will is waiting alone in front of what must look to a child like an abandoned, faintly frightening house. When Sully finally remembers and comes back out, Will is scared and trying not to show it. Asked if Sully forgot him, his answer is “I didn’t mean to” — not an accusation, an apology, as if the failure were his own. Sully gives him an actual choice — come inside or go find his dad — and Will chooses his dad.

Peter’s response, when he hears what happened, is one of the harshest lines in the movie: “You’re never going to change, are you?” Sully doesn’t defend himself this time either. He finds Will alone and admits it plainly, without a joke: “Kind of messed up today, didn’t I? You were pretty scared, weren’t you?” Then he tells him what he used to do at Will’s age whenever he got scared: try to be brave for exactly one minute, then two. He hands Will his own watch to time it. It’s the same translation Sully always makes, turning a feeling into a task and then doing the task, except the task this time is teaching a frightened boy how to count out his own courage.

Rub finally says what has been bothering him: “There’s not enough work for the three of us.” Sully brushes past it, tells him not to worry, and when Rub says he doesn’t like it, Sully doesn’t soften: “You don’t have to like it.” It’s about as blunt as Sully gets with anyone in the movie, and it’s aimed at the one person who has never asked much of him beyond a job and a little attention. Rub quits on the spot. Sully chases him down anyway, up onto the sidewalk to keep pace, Peter along for the ride. “You ever seen anybody that stubborn?” Sully asks. “Yes, I have,” Peter says, and doesn’t say who he means.

Rub’s jealousy of Peter never gets explained beyond that apparent math problem: three workers, not enough hours, and Rub is the obvious one to remove. But the work probably isn’t what frightens him most. Peter has a claim on Sully that Rub can never earn, however long he carries the tools or follows him from job to job. What Rub sees shifting toward Peter is not merely employment but something resembling a father’s attention — the little bit of belonging Sully has given him, and perhaps the closest thing to it Rub has ever had.

Hoffman gets maybe four scenes as Officer Raymer, and he’s already refusing to play the role at the level the script would allow him to. Raymer’s whole character is trying to enforce something and failing: the same broken taillight, cited three separate times, threats to impound a truck that never get followed through, a “Sully, you’re on the sidewalk!” answered with an immediate “Up yours, Raymer.” It escalates all the way to an actual firearm — Raymer fires a warning shot at Sully, and gets punched in the face for it — and even that doesn’t buy him any dignity. Afterward, in Judge Flatt’s chambers, Raymer gets asked what he usually does when somebody throws a punch. “Duck,” he says. “Next time, do that,” the judge tells him. Nobody in North Bath takes him seriously, including the camera, including the judge.

What Hoffman brings to the part is real, specific frustration — not comic-relief incompetence, but the exhaustion of a man losing a battle he cannot win against people who decided years ago that he doesn’t matter. This is 1994, well before the Philip Seymour Hoffman most audiences came to know, and the thing that would define so much of his later work is already visible: the instinct for locating the bruised, lonely, very real person underneath a role that could have remained a punchline. Even in a part this small, he can’t help himself.

The smirk arrives half a beat before the line. The deflection comes dressed up as a joke. It’s Bruce Willis playing Carl Roebuck, and he wants you to know he’s smarter than the room he’s in. None of it reads as a tic at the time — that happens only in retrospect, after watching him run variations on the same play across dozens of later pictures. What complicates the read is what Willis gave up to appear here at all. He was commanding something like fifteen million dollars for action movies at the time. NOBODY’S FOOL paid him Screen Actors Guild scale, roughly fourteen hundred dollars a week, because he wanted to work opposite Newman badly enough to take the cut. He wasn’t coasting on the persona, though he couldn’t entirely escape it even while trying to do something smaller. Willis retired from acting in 2022 after an aphasia diagnosis that was later specified as frontotemporal dementia. A movie filled with bodies beginning to send their owners overdue bills plays differently with that knowledge sitting beside it.

Wirf delivers the news like a subpoena: “You own the house on Bowdin again. She paid the back taxes.” Sully’s first reaction isn’t gratitude. “I told you I didn’t want anything to do with that place.” Wirf doesn’t let him off the hook. This isn’t about what Sully wants, he says, and he doesn’t care what Sully wants. “This is about need.”

Clive Jr. has skipped town by this point, and Wirf spells out what that means for Beryl in a single line: she needs this gesture to matter, and she needs Sully to be grateful for it, whether or not he wants a dilapidated house loaded with memories he has spent his life avoiding. The movie never tells us what becomes of the place. We’ve already seen the inside, run-down enough to require far more than a few weekends of repair, and nothing in the remaining runtime suggests Sully has suddenly developed the follow-through to restore a house he never wanted back. Ownership isn’t the same thing as a plan.

Sully’s version of a Christmas present is a coin. “It occurs to me I forgot to give you your Christmas present. Call your wife. Telephone’s right there.” No wrapping, no sentiment — just a quarter and a nod toward the pay phone. It’s the same translation that has run through the whole movie: the ride instead of an embrace for Peter, the watch instead of comfort for Will. Except this time, the gift isn’t really an object at all. It’s an opportunity, disguised as an errand so neither man has to acknowledge what it means.

We never hear the call. What we get is the aftermath: Peter finds Sully and asks, “Could you and Rub spare me for a couple days?” The request doesn’t explain itself, and the movie refuses to fill in the blank. Something happened on that phone call — some opening, perhaps even the beginning of a reconciliation — and Sully’s fingerprint is all over it without his ever having to say a word about marriage, fatherhood, or any feeling he can’t disguise as practical advice.

Jessica Tandy died on September 11, 1994, at eighty-five, three months before NOBODY’S FOOL reached theaters. She had been living with ovarian cancer since 1990 and continued working through it. This was the final performance she gave the camera. She never lived to see the film reach an audience. None of that appears on screen exactly — nobody could have built it into the editing — but it is difficult to unknow once you know it, and it recolors a performance that begins with a joke about mortality. Beryl’s opening scene, delivered to a husband who has been dead for years, imagines God closing in on her house one lightning strike at a time. Tandy knew she was seriously ill when she spoke those words into a camera, for a film she would not live to see released.

The tea offer isn’t merely an offer, and it turns out the movie says so explicitly. Right after Sully’s “No, and how many times do I have to tell you?” Beryl doesn’t drop it: “Other people change their minds occasionally. I keep thinking you might.” Sully answers with a surprised “You do?” So it isn’t a ritual with a foregone conclusion on either side. She can recite his answer before he gives it, and she keeps asking anyway. Somewhere underneath the routine, she means it: some real, if modest, hope that today might be different. His surprise suggests he had filed the whole exchange away as a bit they do, never recognizing it as a standing invitation. The tea was never really about tea, but it wasn’t nothing either. It was Beryl checking, one more time, whether the door was open even a crack, dressed up as a beverage so neither of them had to admit what they were doing.

The final spoken line belongs to Sully, looking toward his dog, still waiting outside in the cold: “You may as well come in, too.” Nearly all of this closing exchange — the forgiveness, the tea, “I keep thinking you might,” the dog — tracks the final page of Russo’s novel with barely a change. Benton didn’t so much rewrite the ending as carry it across. Some things, apparently, don’t need translating twice.

Final Verdict: 85 out of 100.


Milk Money (Retro)

by Edward Dunn


MILK MONEY (1994) PG-13 110 Minutes Director: Richard Benjamin Writer: John Mattson Melanie Griffith, Ed Harris, Michael Patrick Carter CAST Melanie Griffith...V Ed Harris...Tom Wheeler Michael Patrick Carter...Frank Wheeler Malcolm McDowell...Green Anne Heche...Betty Casey Siemaszko...Joe Philip Bosco...Judge

The comedy section at Blockbuster on a Friday afternoon was its own kind of purgatory. The good movies were already gone, and you were left staring at everything that remained, trying to convince yourself that something on that wall was worth the trip back by Tuesday. MILK MONEY was almost certainly on that wall every single time — not in the new releases, just sitting in the regular comedy section at the five-day price, practically begging to be rented. I can't tell you the specific Friday, or what I ended up taking home instead. But I'm a hundred percent certain I looked at that box, decided against it, and moved on. In 2026, I finally sat down with it. Twice. The second viewing was a mistake.

MILK MONEY presents its premise with a confidence that borders on oblivious. Three middle-school boys pool their lunch money to hire a prostitute. Not for a gangbang, strictly to see a naked lady, and one of them decides she should marry his widowed father. The movie treats the whole arrangement as essentially wholesome. But in the most literal sense, it's PRETTY WOMAN with children. The comparison flatters it slightly — PRETTY WOMAN at least had the decency to be self-aware about what it was asking the audience to accept.

The surest way to expose the deeper problem is to reverse the genders. Imagine a twelve-year-old girl and her friends pooling their money to hire a male stripper, bringing him home, and engineering a romance between him and her widowed mother. That movie is not a PG-13 family comedy with a Randy Newman song. MILK MONEY never notices the gap, which is either its greatest liability or its strangest achievement.

The boys are where the movie is most comfortable and most itself. The opening stretch has a STAND BY ME quality to it — the loogie conversation, the shoebox time capsule filled with things they don't understand, the earnest pooling of lunch money for one ridiculous goal. That city trip has real momentum, the kind of low-stakes adventure where the journey matters more than whatever they find at the end.

Then they meet V, stumble home, and Frank decides she should become his new mother. At that moment the movie quietly stops being about three twelve-year-old boys and turns into a romance. The kids get demoted to supporting players in their own story. Frank hangs on the longest — he is, after all, the strategist — but even he eventually becomes furniture for the adult plot. The movie never quite recovers the energy it had before it remembered it was supposed to be about love.

There are a lot of famous Eds. Ed O'Neill comes to mind. Ed Norton from THE HONEYMOONERS definitely counts — Edward Norton the actor does not. But Ed Harris is the Ed that makes you proud to carry the name. He plays Tom Wheeler with a complete sincerity that the material neither earns nor deserves. That sincerity is the main thing standing between the audience and the abyss beneath the premise. Harris plays it like a man genuinely falling in love — which is the only way the movie works.

The best scene in the film comes when Tom and V stand in the driveway simultaneously informing each other that they have no interest in having sex. It works entirely because Harris plays it completely straight. No winking, no self-consciousness. Just a widowed science teacher who has recently removed his pants in a tree house at a woman's request, now trying to understand how he got here.

Melanie Griffith was 37 when MILK MONEY was filmed, which creates a conundrum the movie can't fully resolve. The role as written implies someone younger — a woman still early enough in the game that the criminal hierarchy is hunting her with real urgency. But younger wouldn't have worked emotionally, and Griffith is the reason why. She has a quality not unlike Carol Kane: breathy, slightly otherworldly, operating on a frequency just adjacent to everyone else's. Something knowing and vulnerable in the same breath. Her real name is Eve, a detail the movie mentions once and then drops. She left home at 14, which means she missed the adolescence that Frank and his friends are currently stumbling through. By the time she lands in Middleton she isn't just hiding from Waltzer — she's encountering, for the first time, things she was never allowed to want. That requires an actress with some mileage. Griffith brings enough of the world with her that the fake suburb starts to look appealing rather than merely convenient. Like Marisa Tomei in THE WRESTLER, it's casting that initially reads as a problem and gradually reveals itself as the only choice that makes sense.

MILK MONEY has a tone problem it never solves. The premise requires actual menace — a dead pimp, a criminal hierarchy, Malcolm McDowell hunting a woman across a generic Northeastern suburb — but the PG-13 rating ensures that menace can only be implied. Cash's murder is reported on the evening news rather than shown. Waltzer's threats stop just short of anything the movie can follow through on. McDowell is effortlessly menacing in the way only he can be, but the rating keeps pulling the rug out from under him. The result is a thriller element that feels purely decorative.

You're never really worried about V because the movie has already told you what kind of film it is — the kind with a Randy Newman song. The British villain, in what appears to be an Italian criminal enterprise, goes unexplained and unacknowledged. The gangster hierarchy is introduced so casually that no reasonable audience member could be expected to retain it. When McDowell finally turns up at a middle school sock hop waving a gun, the effect is less escalation than interruption. The comedy half of MILK MONEY is warm and occasionally charming. The thriller half exists because the movie needed an ending.

The wetlands subplot deserves its own accounting. Tom Wheeler's mission to save the last five acres of the Tonapaya Wetlands is framed as noble from the start — the devoted scientist chaining himself to his truck in a final act of principle. The movie wants you to admire him for it. It's harder to admire once you remember that Frank has already lost one parent, and his father is voluntarily inviting the police to haul him away in front of his son. The local paper doesn't even bother to show up. Frank is there to witness the whole thing, and it's treated as a proud moment rather than the quietly devastating one it actually is.

The resolution doesn't help. The wetlands are saved not through activism or community pressure, but because two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in mob money happened to be sitting in V's gas tank. It's a narrative coincidence dressed up as a happy ending. The wetlands survive by accident — which is either a cynical statement about environmental causes or proof that the screenplay had written itself into a corner and needed a quick exit. The movie seems to believe it's the former. The evidence suggests the latter.

MILK MONEY is an older story than it pretends to be. The dance hall girl who goes straight and earns her way back to respectability through the right man and the right circumstances is one of the oldest redemption narratives in American popular culture. GUNSMOKE ran it for twenty years. MILK MONEY runs it for a hundred and ten minutes, swaps the frontier for a suburb that never existed, and calls it a family comedy.

It more or less works, and that's a stranger achievement than it sounds. The boys are funny, Harris is remarkable, Griffith earns more than the material deserves, and the title traces a quiet arc from three kids pooling their lunch money to a woman scooping ice cream in Middleton — whether that's thematic coherence or a happy accident, with MILK MONEY you're never entirely sure.

Final Verdict: 60 out of 100

Sidenote: For the record, Tom does not get herpes.