Radio Flyer (Retro)

by Edward Dunn


RADIO FLYER (1992) PG-13 114 Minutes Director: Richard Donner Writer: David Mickey Evans Lorraine Bracco, John Heard, Elijah Wood
CAST Elijah Wood...Mike Joseph Mazzello...Bobby Lorraine Bracco...Mary John Heard...Officer Jim Daugherty Adam Baldwin...The King Ben Johnson...Geronimo Bill Tom Hanks...Older Mike / Narrator

Somebody’s cold one is givin’ me chills

— Weezer, “Say It Ain’t So”

As a kid, I sometimes took things apart, but I never had much interest in putting them back together. My preferred form of construction was less mechanical: I disappeared into movies and television, using other people's stories to put some distance between myself and whatever I didn't want to think about. Telling it that way now, I can't be sure how much of it is memory and how much is the shape I've given it over time. I can't relate to building a flying wagon, but I understand why Mike and Bobby need to believe one can fly — and why the man telling their story may need it even more than they did.

Bracco, fresh off GOODFELLAS, plays against every expectation her casting creates. You brace for someone hard enough to have survived Paulie Cicero's crew; instead, Mary is soft, hopeful, and repeatedly talked back into a marriage that's already put one of her children in a hospital bed. Her husband is the King to everyone in the house, a nickname that tells you almost everything about a man who needed one. The first promise comes at Bobby's bedside, after the King's arrest: "I promise this will never happen again." Not long afterward, while Mary is on the phone trying to prevent their truck from being repossessed, Bobby is the one reassuring Mike that the King is coming back and that "it's not Mom's fault." He returns on a temporary release to bury his mother, crying that he's changed, and Mary believes him again. The second promise arrives later in a quieter domestic scene — "It's gonna be different … I promise" — and by then the boys have learned to perform belief whether they feel it or not: "We believe you, Mom." "Yeah. We do." Wood is especially good as the watchful kid stationed beside something dangerous, a role he would return to in THE GOOD SON. There, Mark studies Henry because the adults can't see what he sees; here, Mike watches the King — and watches over Bobby — while the adults see enough and still fail to protect him. The sheriff's office sits only a building or two from their garage door. It's difficult to share Bobby's instinct to absolve his mother completely, even accounting for everything she's up against. There's a SOUTH PARK bit about divorced parents that crudely captures the hierarchy Mary's choices create: happiness and the new relationship first, the child somewhere after. Bobby is living the version without the joke.

The turtle isn't the throwaway gag he first looks like. He's found the day they discover the old clubhouse, having broken his own chain to climb inside. Shane's reaction makes them brace for worse, until Bobby stammers "it's a—" and Mike finishes it: "turtle." He gets named Samson on the spot, for exactly that strength, welcomed in as family. It plays as pure comedy in the moment. But Mike's note before the launch says they took "Samson and Shane, too," and in the framing scenes, when his own kids ask about their turtle, Mike pinkie-promises this is the same one — the only one of the three animals who survives into the present tense with a promise attached to him. Shane is the one whose stakes remain physical, at least for as long as the story keeps him in frame, and he's perfectly cast — those eyes do more acting than some of the humans in the frame. When he disappears and there's blood on the kitchen door, nothing in the dialogue explains what happened to him. He reappears for the final trip riding inside the Flyer rather than walking beside the boys, apparently hurt but alive, and Mike's note confirms that he went with Bobby too. The movie confirms his survival without explaining either the blood on the door or why he can no longer make the trip on foot.

The buffalo gets no such confirmation, ever. He's real at Geronimo Bill's roadside farm, where a boy asks if he might be the last buffalo left in the world, then he's a dream handing Mike a sense of purpose and a duty to protect Bobby — almost exactly the spirit-animal move THE SIMPSONS would later run with a talking coyote and a handful of insanity peppers — and finally he's reduced to a line in Bobby's postcard: "I scared the buffalo, flying too low." Promised, then lost from view, then never confirmed at all — the same widening gap between what happened and what got told that the ending runs on.

The film has its own excuse ready for anyone asking how a homemade wagon is supposed to fly, and it isn't aerodynamics. Every kid is born with seven great abilities and fascinations, the story goes, and loses them one by one on the way to adulthood — flight being the last and hardest to let go of. Fisher tried to hold onto his at fourteen, off a hill that would later carry his name, while his friends begged him to stop: "This is nuts, Fish. You're gonna get hurt." He didn't stop, and it went badly enough to become local legend before Mike and Bobby ever moved to the neighborhood. Even the boys argue about the legend before they've found the place. "He wasn't that great," Bobby says, until Mike pushes back and he overcorrects into some exaggeration of his own — the jump was off a barn, he insists, "probably two miles" down — before landing on his real verdict: "He probably did a good try. He just did it wrong." It's a kid's explanation, and a practical one. Bobby assumes Fisher failed because he made a mistake. The movie eventually settles on something stranger: Fisher simply waited too long. By fourteen, he'd already lost the seven great abilities.

They go looking for the hill anyway, and at "Fisher's Landing," where Fisher had made his own attempt ten years before they moved into the neighborhood, they try the same wager he lost. The film never pauses to acknowledge what this is — an adult giving a child pointers for a dangerous stunt — because Fisher isn't staged as a bystander who should know better. He's staged as a fellow believer, someone close enough to his own failure to root for a different outcome instead of stopping it. What Fisher offers Bobby from behind the gas pump, visibly marked by the same fall that made him a legend, is purely mechanical: ease off at the bottom, don't pull up, mind the angle, you'll stall. Nothing about abilities or fascinations. The film's own explanation for why Fisher failed and Bobby might not is mystical. The only actual expertise anyone in the movie offers is physics.

You could read the ending three ways, and the film leaves room for all three. Take the film at its word: the Flyer works, and the postcards that follow are proof of it, arriving — older Mike says — "every time I felt them slipping away," the seven great abilities and fascinations replenished right on cue, as if the universe knew exactly when he needed reassurance. Or take it sideways: "he grew up to be exactly what he was born to be: a flyer" is also a fair description of someone who never stops moving, who visits every place he ever dreamed of rather than stay anywhere long enough to be found — less a magical fulfillment than a very long way of running, the same thing LOST would later do to half its cast. Or take the physical ending at its most literal and least kind: the Flyer never leaves the ground, the King is hauled off for a charge the movie never bothers naming — even the supposedly real ending withholds its central fact — and the family simply goes home, the postcards a comfort older Mike invented because the actual ending wasn't a story he could tell.

The film doesn't adjudicate between these. Instead, it warns you that certainty isn't what Mike is offering when he turns to his own kids and asks if they finally understand what he meant about "history being in the mind of the teller." And when the moment comes to settle what happened to Bobby, the line he reaches for is "that's how I remember him" — which is a very different claim from that's what happened. The one apparent exception is Samson, and even that turns out to be less than it seems. Mike's children apparently have a turtle named Samson, but his connection to Bobby's flight exists only through Mike's pinkie-promise — the same kind of assurance Mary kept offering back when promises never seemed to hold.

Whoever RADIO FLYER was made for, it wasn't the children nominally invited to watch a story about a flying wagon — a PG-13 rating covers plenty of kid-marketed blockbusters too, but not many of them put a child in a hospital bed, whatever the poster promised. Columbia's marketing department couldn't figure out how to sell it either, spending $10 million promoting something that grossed only $4.6 million domestically against a reported $35 million budget. Critics couldn't agree on what they had seen. Roger Ebert wrote that the film "pushes so many fundamental questions under the rug" of its own screenplay; the Washington Post, reviewing the same movie, praised its "evocative texture" and how moving it found the brothers' bond.

Richard Donner later insisted that the ending means exactly what it shows, nothing cryptic — a claim that sits oddly beside his own studio's test screenings. One cut had adult Mike finding Bobby's Flyer hanging in the Smithsonian, which confused audiences; when that scene was removed, an intermediate version was left with Mike's voiceover narration but no onscreen adult Mike to establish who was telling the story. Donner finally took a day off from LETHAL WEAPON 3 to shoot the airfield framing scenes that open and close the finished film. The studio couldn't settle on its ending any more easily than the critics could settle on the movie.

THE SANDLOT runs the same basic trick — ordinary neighborhood objects and local legends inflated into myth by kids who need a mythology to organize their summer — but keeps the actual stakes safely inside the myth itself. Nobody's real life depends on whether the Beast is really a monster. RADIO FLYER uses the same structure and drops in a stepfather. ATONEMENT offers a closer comparison for the ending specifically, since it also ends with its storyteller admitting, in effect, that what we watched wasn't the whole truth — except ATONEMENT spells it out. Briony tells you directly that she gave her characters the ending reality denied them. RADIO FLYER approaches the same kind of confession and then pulls back, leaving the gap open rather than closing it.

BIG FISH is the version of this device that works most comfortably, and the difference is what's at stake in not knowing. If Edward Bloom's tall tales are exaggerations, the cost is a father turning out to be more ordinary than his stories made him. Either way, his life remains whole. If the Flyer never left the ground, the cost is a child who may not have gotten away at all. RADIO FLYER never fully earns the tenderness it borrows from stories in which uncertainty can be affectionate rather than horrifying.

The Flyer itself never quite convinces me. The need for it does. The boys' attempt to turn terror into escape remains moving even when the escape looks impossible. Mike may be preserving a miracle, disguising a loss, or doing both at once. I don't entirely believe the story he tells. I understand why he needs to tell it that way.

Final Verdict: 64 out of 100


A Man Called Otto (Retro-ish)

by Edward Dunn


A MAN CALLED OTTO (2022) PG-13 126 Minutes Director: Marc Forster Writer: David Magee Tom Hanks, Mariana Treviño, Rachel Keller
CAST Tom Hanks...Otto Anderson Mariana Treviño...Marisol Rachel Keller...Sonya Manuel Garcia-Rulfo...Tommy Cameron Britton...Jimmy Mack Bayda...Malcolm Juanita Jennings...Anita Kelly Lamor Wilson...Shari Kenzie Christiana Montoya...Luna Mike Birbiglia...Real Estate Agent Alessandra Perez...Abbie Peter Lawson Jones...Reuben Truman Hanks...Young Otto Kailey Hyman...Barb Lawrence Turner...Neighbor

I can buy Tom Hanks in a lot of roles. Mentally challenged? Sure. Man pretending to be a woman to score an apartment? Why not. But a convincing grumpy old bastard? That's a stretch. That's like asking Sean Penn to play someone brilliant. Hanks would need something spectacular—like a full Mel Gibson DUI meltdown—to make me believe he's capable of real curmudgeonry. To me, he's always been more George Clooney than grizzled misanthrope: pleasant enough, but not a reason to see (or skip) a movie. In A MAN CALLED OTTO, Hanks imitates a grumpy man without ever fully inhabiting the role. Still, he does a serviceable job with imperfect material, because even I'm not completely immune to that trademark Hanks charm.

The charm covers for more than Hanks's performance. A MAN CALLED OTTO keeps choosing the version of Otto's life with less friction in it, scene after scene. In the book, Ove is sixteen when his father is killed by a runaway railway carriage. He tells his school he'll be back in two weeks. He never returns. He works the railway for five years before Sonja asks what he'd want out of life, and he answers, without thinking, that he'd like to build houses. She doesn't laugh — she gets angry that he's done nothing about it — and days later she's back with brochures for a correspondence course in engineering: less a gift than a dare. The movie keeps the milestone and drops the dare. A "CLASS of '78" banner, a cap and gown, Sonya reading his diploma aloud in the car, in the same beat where he proposes. The funeral gets the same flattening. Ove's instructions are absolute — "No people. No messing about!" — and the book's payoff is that nobody listens: more than three hundred mourners show up anyway, a scale of defiance the story needs to make its point. Otto asks for "nothing overblown" instead, and receives exactly that, no defiance required. A correspondence course became a cap and gown. A funeral nobody wanted became a service everybody agreed to.

What Otto owns isn't the only thing that gets revised. Who he's allowed to be does too. In the book, Ove spends years as chairman of the Residents' Association, with Rune — vice-chairman, eventual Volvo man — at his side, until a steering committee votes him out over a fight about trash-room surveillance cameras. He calls it "the coup d'état." Years later, a different camera system comes up for a vote, and Ove is the only one who votes against it, distrustful of anything connected to the internet. The movie keeps the shape of the story — Homeowner's Association, a coup, a vote — but swaps out the mess. Otto is voted out for standing up for wheelchair access for his disabled wife, after a developer tells him "there's places for people like your wife." He shoves the man. And the neighbor who replaces him isn't a committee, it's Reuben, one specific friend, so an institutional grievance becomes a personal betrayal instead. Ove's version stays messy, and occasionally wrong. Otto's stays clean enough to still be right about it, out loud, on his own street.

Even the cars follow this rule. Ove and Rune spend their whole friendship trading upgrades — a Saab 96 against a Volvo 244 when they first move in, a Saab 9000i against a Volvo 760 decades later — one-upmanship neither of them ever calls off. Ove's last car is a blue Saab 9-5. Not long after he buys it, General Motors buys up the remaining Swedish shares in the company, and Ove spends an afternoon swearing about it, then vows never to drive an American car again for the rest of his life. Everything built since, he decides, is "like driving a computer." Otto inherits his loyalty instead of earning it: his father teaches him what makes a Chevy engine run, calls it "Dependable," and years later, telling Sonya the same story on their first dinner date, Otto ends on the identical word. No rivalry, no argument. Only inheritance. Near the end, Otto buys himself a new truck — an actual 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV, a model that didn't exist yet when his own tombstone says he died — and takes Marisol's family for a ride in it. General Motors is the villain of one version of this story and the retirement gift in the other. Commercially convenient beats internally consistent, right to the end.

The Swedish film isn't only closer to the book — it's proof the remake's choices were choices, not casualties of adaptation. Its version of the threat to Rune isn't a real estate company. It's a privatized eldercare contractor called Consensus, a name that undercuts itself a scene later, when Ove threatens to report the company and the rep falls back on corporate boilerplate: only a private contractor carrying out decisions made somewhere else, nothing personal. A reporter separately produces the company's own financial statements, thin profits despite a shareholder's stake. Dye & Merika wants a neighborhood. Consensus wants a return on investment. A school interviews Sonja for a teaching job and turns her down — no plan for a teacher with physical disabilities, they tell her. Her answer is six words: "Either we die or we live." Ove's isn't a speech. He drives to the school that night and builds a wheelchair ramp himself, alone, finished by morning. The American screenplay keeps a version of that ramp — Tommy finds it in the garage years later, mentions it in front of Otto, and Otto is furious — but it doesn't linger on the building of it. Instead, Otto tells Marisol the story as it turns toward the neighborhood's inaccessible new construction, the confrontation that gets him thrown off the board. The Swedish film doesn't need an audience for Ove's ramp. The American film needs a board to vote on it.

All three versions keep her in the same place: dead before the story starts, present only in memory, which does most of the idealizing on its own. The intervention scene repeats almost word for word across adaptations, including the Swedish line already quoted above. The American film stages the same moment, mid-suicide-attempt, with the same function: "You're angry. And sad. So am I. But now we have to live." Neither is a conversation. Both are visitations. Only the Swedish film seems to notice this is a problem. Parvaneh, who never met Sonja, tells Ove he's "made her into some kind of saint" who'd probably rather have been ordinary. Ove tells her to be quiet. The scene doesn't fix anything — Sonja never gets a moment of her own where she's simply present and unremarkable, not in this version or any other. Naming the sainthood isn't the same as undoing it. The American film doesn't even name it.

None of this makes the film empty. It means the craft is there and gets used selectively. Otto refuses to buy Sonya a crib early in their marriage and builds one himself instead. Decades later, he finds it in the attic, still wrapped in plastic, alongside a memory of a very pregnant Sonya watching him put it together. Nobody explains why he kept it sealed all this time. When he finally gives it to Marisol's family, he sets their baby inside it himself: "See? It works. You like that? Good." The connection to the child they'd once been expecting is never spoken. The cat scenes show the same confidence. Otto throws it off his bed the first night and sets it up with a towel by the door instead. By morning it's back on the bed with him, asleep, and he's holding its tail in his palm, no comment on the reversal. Later, at Sonya's grave, mid-visit, the cat comes forward on its own and rests its head against his palm. Both moments pass without a word. This is the same movie that has a character spell out the "Dye & Merika" pun and then confirm it, in case anyone missed it. The filmmakers know how to let a scene sit in silence. They don't always choose to.

The math doesn't work, and it isn't close. Sonya's side of the shared headstone gives her death as 2018, which matches the year stamped on almost every present-day scene heading in the shooting script — the whole Marisol-moves-in, HOA-ousting stretch of the story happens inside that single year. Otto's side of the same stone gives his death as 2022. Four years, and the film doesn't visibly spend them: no aging on the kids, nothing different about the block, nothing anywhere on screen arguing for time having passed at all. The tombstone changed. Everything else stayed staged for 2018. The Silverado was one prop with the wrong date. This is the whole movie with the wrong date.

Otto has a crib nobody explains sitting in the same movie as a joke that explains itself twice — real craft, present and demonstrated, used only when convenient. The whole movie keeps making the same choice, right down to a truck the timeline has no room for. Hanks didn't write any of that. He shows up for the two or three scenes that ask something real of him, and he delivers, which is more than the script consistently earns. A MAN CALLED OTTO isn't hollow. It's a film that knew how to be better and chose, over and over, not to be.

Final Verdict: 63 out of 100.


Cloud Atlas

by Edward Dunn


CLOUD ATLAS
PG-13
165 Minutes
Directors: Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski, Lana Wachowski
Writers: David Mitchell, Lana Wachowski, Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski
Tom Hanks, Susan Sarandon, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent

Cast (I know it's a mess, but that's not my fault.)

Tom Hanks... Dr. Henry Goose / Hotel Manager / Isaac Sachs / Dermot Hoggins / Cavendish Look-a-Like Actor / Zachry
Halle Berry... Native Woman / Jocasta Ayrs / Luisa Rey / Indian Party Guest / Ovid / Meronym
Jim Broadbent ... Captain Molyneux / Vyvyan Ayrs / Timothy Cavendish / Korean Musician / Prescient 2
Hugo Weaving... Haskell Moore / Tadeusz Kesselring / Bill Smoke / Nurse Noakes / Boardman Mephi / Old Georgie
Jim Sturgess... Adam Ewing / Poor Hotel Guest / Megan's Dad / Highlander / Hae-Joo Chang / Adam / Zachry Brother-in-Law
Doona Bae ... Tilda / Megan's Mom / Mexican Woman / Sonmi-451 / Sonmi-351 / Sonmi Prostitute
Ben Whishaw ... Cabin Boy / Robert Frobisher / Store Clerk / Georgette / Tribesman
Keith David... Kupaka / Joe Napier / An-kor Apis / Prescient
James D'Arcy... Young Rufus Sixsmith / Old Rufus Sixsmith / Nurse James / Archivist
Xun Zhou... Talbot / Hotel Manager / Yoona-939 / Rose
David Gyasi ... Autua / Lester Rey / Duophsyte
Susan Sarandon... Madame Horrox / Older Ursula / Yusouf Suleiman / Abbess
Hugh Grant... Rev. Giles Horrox / Hotel Heavy / Lloyd Hooks / Denholme Cavendish / Seer Rhee / Kona Chief

This is a complex story, far too difficult for me to summarize with words, due to personal laziness. Nonetheless, I will review this random collection of sights and sounds, called CLOUD ATLAS.

There are 6 intertwined stories. From the mid 19th century to 2144. Most of the actors play 6 different characters from different eras.  The make up is done so well, that this cost-cutting measure is barely noticeable.

If I eat breakfast at Denny's, I won't be disappointed with my food. Because my expectations were low to begin with. Halle Berry and Hugh Grant are different, they aren't a couple of 'Grand Slams' (in both senses of that term). All they've done, thus far, is shoot par on their own course. Even if it's just by accident, they will eventually give a passable performance. And so, this eventuality has now become a reality. They gave us something passable; CLOUD ATLAS is their magnus opus...wait...I meant magna opera, that's the correct plural form of magnus opus...my bad.

I'm not saying CLOUD ATLAS is good because of Berry and Grant, but rather it's good despite their presence; it's only a coincidence. The missing variable is Tom Hanks. He's like that lemon slice you use to make Miller High Life more palatable. This 'Bosom Buddy' can make less-than-stellar actors look good. There are limits, though. All the Tom Hanks in the world, won't make Gary Busey look good, or human for that matter.

Some may not care for how long the movie is, or its erratic narrative. I could say, I found it deep and profound. But I can't anticipate your reaction. Who knows? Perhaps the film's message will fall upon deaf ears. It's really not my place to be so judgmental.

Final Verdict: 90 out of 100