Bushwhacked (Retro)

by Edward Dunn


BUSHWHACKED (1995) PG-13 90 minutes Director: Greg Beeman Writers: John Jordan, Danny Byers, Tommy Swerdlow, Michael Goldberg Daniel Stern, Jon Polito, Brad Sullivan CAST Daniel Stern...Max Grabelski Jon Polito...Agent Palmer Brad Sullivan...Jack Erickson Ann Dowd...Mrs. Patterson Anthony Heald...Reinhart Bragdon Tom Wood...Agent McMurrey Blake Bashoff...Gordy Michael Galeota...Dana Art Evans...Marty
“Scout's Honor — the Hostage Crisis. Day one.”
EyeWitness America

I almost saw BUSHWHACKED on my eleventh birthday. It was August 1995, and the decision came down to two movies. I invited a couple of friends, and after a week of phone tag we settled on BABE instead. My mom drove us to the Everett 9 Cinemas on Everett Mall Way. Thirty years later I had to buy a DVD drive to watch the one we didn't pick.

BUSHWHACKED began life as a HOME ALONE spinoff, with Stern reprising Marv in his own movie. By the time it reached theaters the character had been renamed Max Grabelski, but not much else had changed. The leather jacket was different. The routine was the same.

It is worth pausing on where Stern was at this point. He had spent the early part of his career doing genuinely interesting work — BREAKING AWAY, DINER, THE WONDER YEARS narration — the kind of roles that suggested an actor with real range and a particular gift for quiet, lived-in characters. Then HOME ALONE happened. Marv made him famous in a way his better work never had, and the years that followed were largely an attempt to stay in that lane. BUSHWHACKED is somewhere near the end of that attempt. By 1995 the lane was narrowing and the material was getting thinner, and you can feel it in every scene.

The setup has genuine potential. Max Grabelski is a courier who has been making regular late-night deliveries to a millionaire named Reinhart Bragdon, pocketing fifty-dollar tips and not asking questions. When he shows up one night to find the mansion on fire and a gun in his face, he grabs the weapon and runs. Bragdon turns up dead. Max is the obvious suspect. What the film doesn't bother to develop is the more interesting story underneath — that Max had been cultivated as a fall guy over multiple visits, set up by someone he thought he had a friendly arrangement with. That's almost noir territory. BUSHWHACKED doesn't notice.

Instead it pivots. On the run and out of options, Max finds himself mistaken for the scout leader of a ranger troop and ends up chaperoning a group of kids into the wilderness. The film decides this is the movie it wants to be, and everything that came before it is quietly abandoned.

Daniel Stern is a strange fit for this part. He has always been better bouncing off somebody else than carrying a whole movie on his back. That was true in BREAKING AWAY, true in DINER, and even true in HOME ALONE, where Joe Pesci gave Marv something to play against. Here he is out there on his own, flailing, and after a while the flailing starts to feel less funny and more desperate.

The character doesn't help. Max is supposed to read as a lovable screwup, but Stern plays him as sneaky and sniveling in a way that never quite invites you in. There is a difference between a character who makes bad decisions and a character you don't want to spend time with. BUSHWHACKED doesn't seem aware of the distinction. Even physically, he never convinces as a delivery driver — he looks less like someone who has spent years jumping in and out of a truck and more like Jeff Goldblum waiting to explain chaos theory. The job is just a costume, like everything else in the movie.

Stern himself briefly returned to the headlines earlier this year after being cited for soliciting a prostitute. The charge was dismissed after he completed an education program, which is more closure than BUSHWHACKED ever manages.

The supporting cast is better than the movie around them. Jon Polito and Anthony Heald both seem to be acting in a slightly different film — one that takes the crime angle more seriously than BUSHWHACKED does. Polito brings his usual blustery authority, while Heald, who played the slimy Dr. Chilton in SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, is slippery enough to make Reinhart Bragdon feel like a real villain instead of just a plot device. Even the smaller roles help. Art Evans shows up briefly as Max's boss and instantly makes the delivery company feel more believable than the script ever does. And Brad Sullivan, as the real scout leader, has that rigid, humorless authority figure energy that used to show up in a lot of 90s kids movies. For brief stretches, they make you wonder if a better movie was hiding in here somewhere.

There are moments where the comedy actually lands — a smoke signal sequence where the distress call comes out as “Belp Belp,” and a campfire scene where the kids calmly diagnose every red flag Max ignored. But they are islands. The film can't build anything around them.

BUSHWHACKED lists four writers, and the movie feels like it. The first act sets up a mildly interesting crime farce involving mob money and a faked death. Then Max ends up with the scout troop and the film abruptly resets into a children's wilderness adventure. The result feels less like one story than two different ideas stapled together and hoping nobody notices.

Watching it now, what struck me most was how little the film's version of scouting resembled anything I actually experienced. I was the same age as these kids when BUSHWHACKED came out in August of 1995. I had just finished Cub Scouts and decided I was not quite dorky enough to continue to Boy Scouts. Trips like this were never a handful of kids wandering around the mountains with one adult. They were organized camps, designated sites, and a small army of parents hovering nearby. If my own dad was working nights or weekends, I would end up going with another kid and his father and sharing a tent. That was the reality. BUSHWHACKED turns it into something closer to a children's adventure novel, where a complete stranger can show up in a leather jacket and loafers, claim to be the scout leader, and no parent notices anything is wrong.

Once you notice that gap between reality and the movie's version of it, the rest of BUSHWHACKED starts to unravel pretty quickly. The cartoon logic extends well beyond the scouting. The parents never notice the absence of camping gear. The real scout leader gets his head glued to a steering wheel and the cops, assuming he's their suspect, rip it loose and move on. Later, when the rope bridge is cut, the correct response would be helicopters and a full search and rescue operation within the hour. BUSHWHACKED treats it as a mild inconvenience.

The money plot doesn't hold up much better. The film gestures at worn currency scheduled for destruction as the basis for the scheme, which is almost a clever idea, but the mechanics of how a private courier ends up delivering mob money never get explained in any satisfying way. Pull on any thread and the whole thing unravels. The movie even seems dimly aware of the problem. In one campfire scene Max lays out his situation as a hypothetical, and the kids immediately identify every red flag he ignored. “Only a sucker would fall for that,” one of them says. The film accidentally wrote its own critique.

BUSHWHACKED wants you to feel good about Max by the end. He saves a kid, earns his scout badge, and everyone forgives everything. It is a tidier resolution than CELTIC PRIDE managed, and at least the film gives Max a concrete moment of courage to hang the redemption on. But the more you think about it, the more the whole arc collapses.

The kids would have been fine without him. Better than fine. If Max had never stolen the scout leader's Hummer and taken his place, they would have had a normal overnight trip with an experienced scout leader, come home the next morning, and none of what follows would have happened. The bears, the rope bridge, the criminals with guns — Max didn't save these children from danger. He created it. The film asks you to applaud him for resolving a crisis that was entirely his fault.

My friends and I made the right call that August. BABE was the better movie by any measure, and thirty years later it still holds up in a way BUSHWHACKED doesn't. But there is something quietly satisfying about finally watching the one we didn't pick, even if the experience mostly confirms what eleven-year-old me suspected from the trailer — that it was going to be a lot of Daniel Stern falling down and not much else.

Final Verdict: 44 out of 100


Celtic Pride (Retro)

by Edward Dunn


CELTIC PRIDE (1996) PG-13 91 minutes Director: Tom DeCerchio Writer: Judd Apatow, Colin Quinn Damon Wayans, Daniel Stern, Dan Aykroyd CAST Damon Wayans...Lewis Scott Daniel Stern...Mike O'Hara Dan Aykroyd...Jimmy Flaherty Marcia Strassman...Carol O'Hara Christopher McDonald...Coach Kimball Vladimir Cuk...Lurch Bill Walton...Himself Larry Bird...Himself

I saw CELTIC PRIDE in a theater in 1996. I was a kid, and I still liked most movies at that point. Even then, something felt off. I couldn't have told you what it was. I just knew that I was supposed to be rooting for these two guys and I wasn't.

It took me thirty years and two viewings to figure out why.

By 1996, the Celtics were no longer a team anyone celebrated. The Bird era was over. The Boston Garden had already closed and was waiting to be torn down. The team was bad — genuinely, embarrassingly bad — stuck in the kind of rebuilding purgatory that has no romantic name. This was after Larry Bird, and well before Paul Pierce. If you were a Celtics fan in 1996, you were a person in mourning who hadn't fully accepted it yet.

I came to the Celtics later, and sideways. Seattle still technically had a team when Ray Allen got traded to Boston, but nobody was paying attention anymore. You don't abandon a franchise. Sometimes a franchise abandons you first.

The setup is simple enough. Two Boston superfans kidnap Utah Jazz star Lewis Scott the night before game seven of the NBA Finals, hoping to keep him out of the game long enough for the Celtics to win a championship. They didn't exactly plan it — they blacked out, and Scott was just there when they came to. But they make the conscious decision to keep him, which is where the moral accounting should begin. It never really does.

CELTIC PRIDE wants you to find this charming. Two lovable obsessives doing a desperate thing for the team they love. The problem is that Lewis Scott didn't do anything to them. He's just very good at basketball. Mike and Jimmy are committing a felony against a man whose only offense was being employed by the wrong franchise.

A movie built on this premise has two options. It can commit to the comedy and make everything weightless enough that the audience never stops to think about it. Or it can acknowledge the darkness and do something honest with it. CELTIC PRIDE tries to split the difference and ends up with neither.

This is a movie that has opted out of consequence entirely. A police officer shows up while Scott is being held at gunpoint and just walks away. Later, Mike's wife learns about the kidnapping and doesn't call the police. By the end, Scott himself covers for them. And in case that wasn't enough, they receive a hundred thousand dollars for their trouble. It isn't just saying the kidnapping was fine. It's saying everyone benefited from it.

The closest comparison I can think of is BIG FAN, a 2009 film that takes a similar premise — obsessive fan, athlete, a line that gets crossed — and never blinks. That film understands that this kind of story only works if you're willing to look directly at what fanaticism actually costs. CELTIC PRIDE keeps looking away.

Daniel Stern is the most capable actor in the cast and the most wasted. Anyone who has seen him in DINER or BREAKING AWAY knows what he can do with a character who is quietly falling apart. There are traces of that here — the divorce, the failed athletic dreams that Carol's therapist has already diagnosed — but it never follows through on any of it. Instead it asks him to ride the goodwill of his HOME ALONE persona until the wheels fall off. Mike O'Hara had the potential to be genuinely tragic. He ends up being Marv with a Celtics jersey.

Dan Aykroyd is a different problem. His best work has always leaned into his strangeness — BLUES BROTHERS, GHOSTBUSTERS, even CONEHEADS finds the right vehicle for his particular energy. Jimmy Flaherty needed someone whose obsession reads as unhinged and human simultaneously. Aykroyd comes across as unhinged and alien. The Boston accent doesn't help. It hits the broad markers but never finds the rhythm, and by the third scene the accent begins to overwhelm the character.

Christopher McDonald is playing a familiar variation of himself. In this case, that's exactly what the movie requires — a coach radiating Tom Thibodeau levels of sideline stress.

Damon Wayans, to his credit, is competent. That sounds like faint praise and it is, but competent is the ceiling in a film this untethered. He's playing the only character with any grounding in actual consequence, and he doesn't oversell it. The press conference apology is a good example — his character explains his back problems come from carrying a sorry excuse for a team all season. It lands somewhere between groan and laugh, which is probably the best CELTIC PRIDE ever manages.

There is something performative about the fandom here that never goes away. Mike and Jimmy feel less like obsessives and more like two men doing an impression of what fanaticism looks like. The jerseys, the memorabilia, the superstitions — it all reads as a costume rather than a life. A real fanatic has a specificity to their devotion that is almost impossible to fake. These two could take the jerseys off and go home.

CELTIC PRIDE is rated PG-13, which means the real texture of Boston sports fandom in that era is completely off the table. Anyone who has spent time around that particular strain of New England loyalty knows it has edges it was never going to touch. What you're left with is a sanitized version — fandom as the studio imagined it.

The best thing in CELTIC PRIDE is a peripheral character named Ilyalurtz Bronfermakher, listed in the credits simply as Lurch. He is a seven foot Eastern European player on the Jazz roster who gets approximately four minutes of screen time and is more fully realized than anyone the script is focused on. Vladimir Cuk, who plays him, was a real basketball player before he was an actor, and the cadence he brings to the role is not something you could coach. When Lurch tells his coach he has got the bad crap, and then misses a sure slam dunk, it is the funniest moment in the movie. When he is finally called off the bench late in the game and informs the coach he will be giving them some of that death row shit, you almost wish the movie was about him instead.

The most unexamined relationship in the movie is Mike's wife Carol. Carol is established early as the voice of reason — she has been holding divorce papers for years, her therapist has diagnosed the obsession, she has clearly had enough. Then the kidnapping happens and she just stops being a person. She doesn't report it. She roots for the Jazz to protect her husband from consequences. And presumably stays married to him at the end. CELTIC PRIDE spends the first act building her as someone who finally sees clearly, then quietly asks her to forget all of it. She never gets an explanation and neither does the audience.

CELTIC PRIDE closes with two scenes that tell you everything. After the Celtics win, a police officer asks Lewis Scott if these two men have perpetrated a crime against him. Scott looks at Mike and Jimmy and says "I know these two jerks, they're my friends." No consequences, no accountability, no acknowledgment that anything wrong occurred. The victim absolves his kidnappers because the movie needs a tidy ending and couldn't think of a better way to get there.

And then, seven months later, Mike and Jimmy are outside Deion Sanders' house. In a better movie this might have worked as a jokey button that sends the audience out laughing. Here it just confirms what you already suspected. CELTIC PRIDE doesn't just let them off the hook. It endorses them, suggests that kidnapping athletes is simply what devoted fans do, and that getting away with it once is a reasonable argument for doing it again. CELTIC PRIDE mistakes the absence of consequence for charm. They are not the same thing.

I knew something was wrong with this movie when I was a kid. Thirty years later I can finally explain it. CELTIC PRIDE is a movie about getting away with it. Unfortunately that applies to the filmmakers too.

Final Verdict: 33 out of 100